• אנא העתק/הדבק את הודעת השגיאה המופיעה במסך, אם יש כזו.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• בבקשה הסבר מה רצית לעשות,מה עשית ומה קרה

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• בבקשה העתק והדבק את הטקסט המוצג באנגלית במקום בשפה שלך. אם יש לך צילום מסך (מומלץ) אתה יכול להשתמש ב Imgur.com כדי להעלות אותו להדביק קישור לכאן.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• האם טקסט זה זמין במערכת התרגום? אם כן, האם היא תורגמה במשך יותר מ -24 שעות?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• אנא הסבר את ההצעה שלך במדויק ותמצית כדי שיהיה קל ככל האפשר להבין למה אתה מתכוון.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• מה הוצג על המסך כאשר נחסמה (מסך ריק? חלק ממשק המשחק? הודעת שגיאה?)

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• איזה חלק של הכללים לא היה מכובד על ידי עיבוד BGA

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• האם אפשר לראות את הפרת החוק בשידור החוזר? אם כן, באיזה מספר מהלך?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• מה היה המהלך במשחק שרצית לבצע?

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• מה ניסית לעשות שגרם לפעולה הזו

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• מה קרה כאשר את/ה מנסה לעשות את זה (הודעת שגיאה, הודעת פס סטטוס משחק, ...)?

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• באיזה שלב במשחק הבעייה קרתה (מה היו ההוראות הנכונות)

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• מה קרה כאשר את/ה מנסה לבצע פעולת משחק (הודעת שגיאה, הודעת פס סטטוס משחק, ...)?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• אנא תאר/י את הנושא המוצג. אם יש לך צילום מסך (מומלץ) אתה יכול להשתמש ב Imgur.com כדי להעלות אותו להדביק קישור לכאן.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• בבקשה העתק והדבק את הטקסט המוצג באנגלית במקום בשפה שלך. אם יש לך צילום מסך (מומלץ) אתה יכול להשתמש ב Imgur.com כדי להעלות אותו להדביק קישור לכאן.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• האם טקסט זה זמין במערכת התרגום? אם כן, האם היא תורגמה במשך יותר מ -24 שעות?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• אנא הסבר את ההצעה שלך במדויק ותמצית כדי שיהיה קל ככל האפשר להבין למה אתה מתכוון.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• מה הדפדפן שלך?