• אנא העתק/הדבק את הודעת השגיאה המופיעה במסך, אם יש כזו.

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• בבקשה הסבר מה רצית לעשות,מה עשית ומה קרה

72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• בבקשה העתק והדבק את הטקסט המוצג באנגלית במקום בשפה שלך. אם יש לך צילום מסך (מומלץ) אתה יכול להשתמש ב Imgur.com כדי להעלות אותו להדביק קישור לכאן.

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• האם טקסט זה זמין במערכת התרגום? אם כן, האם היא תורגמה במשך יותר מ -24 שעות?

72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• אנא הסבר את ההצעה שלך במדויק ותמצית כדי שיהיה קל ככל האפשר להבין למה אתה מתכוון.

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• מה הוצג על המסך כאשר נחסמה (מסך ריק? חלק ממשק המשחק? הודעת שגיאה?)

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• איזה חלק של הכללים לא היה מכובד על ידי עיבוד BGA

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• האם אפשר לראות את הפרת החוק בשידור החוזר? אם כן, באיזה מספר מהלך?

72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• מה היה המהלך במשחק שרצית לבצע?

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• מה ניסית לעשות שגרם לפעולה הזו

72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.

• מה קרה כאשר את/ה מנסה לעשות את זה (הודעת שגיאה, הודעת פס סטטוס משחק, ...)?

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• באיזה שלב במשחק הבעייה קרתה (מה היו ההוראות הנכונות)

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• מה קרה כאשר את/ה מנסה לבצע פעולת משחק (הודעת שגיאה, הודעת פס סטטוס משחק, ...)?

72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• אנא תאר/י את הנושא המוצג. אם יש לך צילום מסך (מומלץ) אתה יכול להשתמש ב Imgur.com כדי להעלות אותו להדביק קישור לכאן.

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• בבקשה העתק והדבק את הטקסט המוצג באנגלית במקום בשפה שלך. אם יש לך צילום מסך (מומלץ) אתה יכול להשתמש ב Imgur.com כדי להעלות אותו להדביק קישור לכאן.

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• האם טקסט זה זמין במערכת התרגום? אם כן, האם היא תורגמה במשך יותר מ -24 שעות?

72, maybe -- I can never remember how to do a replay days later and don't see it in the bga faq.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• אנא הסבר את ההצעה שלך במדויק ותמצית כדי שיהיה קל ככל האפשר להבין למה אתה מתכוון.

After incendiary mayhem, you can easily have a situation where multiple bricks lack any bricks underneath. Since the rules offer no guidance as to which one should be the first to fall, if I was playing this in the real world, I'd say the player can pick which brick falls first. But in the bga implementation, the app picks which one falls.

I think you need to add a lot of new rules to cover this, or (much better) simply allow the player to decide. I propose this: if, after mayhem, there are multiple candidates to fall, limn all potential falling bricks and let the player pick which one falls.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?