• אנא העתק/הדבק את הודעת השגיאה המופיעה במסך, אם יש כזו.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• בבקשה הסבר מה רצית לעשות,מה עשית ומה קרה

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• בבקשה העתק והדבק את הטקסט המוצג באנגלית במקום בשפה שלך. אם יש לך צילום מסך (מומלץ) אתה יכול להשתמש ב Imgur.com כדי להעלות אותו להדביק קישור לכאן.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• האם טקסט זה זמין במערכת התרגום? אם כן, האם היא תורגמה במשך יותר מ -24 שעות?

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• אנא הסבר את ההצעה שלך במדויק ותמצית כדי שיהיה קל ככל האפשר להבין למה אתה מתכוון.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• מה הוצג על המסך כאשר נחסמה (מסך ריק? חלק ממשק המשחק? הודעת שגיאה?)

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• איזה חלק של הכללים לא היה מכובד על ידי עיבוד BGA

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• האם אפשר לראות את הפרת החוק בשידור החוזר? אם כן, באיזה מספר מהלך?

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• מה היה המהלך במשחק שרצית לבצע?

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• מה ניסית לעשות שגרם לפעולה הזו

• מה קרה כאשר את/ה מנסה לעשות את זה (הודעת שגיאה, הודעת פס סטטוס משחק, ...)?

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• באיזה שלב במשחק הבעייה קרתה (מה היו ההוראות הנכונות)

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• מה קרה כאשר את/ה מנסה לבצע פעולת משחק (הודעת שגיאה, הודעת פס סטטוס משחק, ...)?

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• אנא תאר/י את הנושא המוצג. אם יש לך צילום מסך (מומלץ) אתה יכול להשתמש ב Imgur.com כדי להעלות אותו להדביק קישור לכאן.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• בבקשה העתק והדבק את הטקסט המוצג באנגלית במקום בשפה שלך. אם יש לך צילום מסך (מומלץ) אתה יכול להשתמש ב Imgur.com כדי להעלות אותו להדביק קישור לכאן.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• האם טקסט זה זמין במערכת התרגום? אם כן, האם היא תורגמה במשך יותר מ -24 שעות?

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• אנא הסבר את ההצעה שלך במדויק ותמצית כדי שיהיה קל ככל האפשר להבין למה אתה מתכוון.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• מה הדפדפן שלך?