• אנא העתק/הדבק את הודעת השגיאה המופיעה במסך, אם יש כזו.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• בבקשה הסבר מה רצית לעשות,מה עשית ומה קרה

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• בבקשה העתק והדבק את הטקסט המוצג באנגלית במקום בשפה שלך. אם יש לך צילום מסך (מומלץ) אתה יכול להשתמש ב Imgur.com כדי להעלות אותו להדביק קישור לכאן.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• האם טקסט זה זמין במערכת התרגום? אם כן, האם היא תורגמה במשך יותר מ -24 שעות?

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• אנא הסבר את ההצעה שלך במדויק ותמצית כדי שיהיה קל ככל האפשר להבין למה אתה מתכוון.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• מה הוצג על המסך כאשר נחסמה (מסך ריק? חלק ממשק המשחק? הודעת שגיאה?)

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• איזה חלק של הכללים לא היה מכובד על ידי עיבוד BGA

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• האם אפשר לראות את הפרת החוק בשידור החוזר? אם כן, באיזה מספר מהלך?

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• מה היה המהלך במשחק שרצית לבצע?

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• מה ניסית לעשות שגרם לפעולה הזו

• מה קרה כאשר את/ה מנסה לעשות את זה (הודעת שגיאה, הודעת פס סטטוס משחק, ...)?

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• באיזה שלב במשחק הבעייה קרתה (מה היו ההוראות הנכונות)

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• מה קרה כאשר את/ה מנסה לבצע פעולת משחק (הודעת שגיאה, הודעת פס סטטוס משחק, ...)?

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• אנא תאר/י את הנושא המוצג. אם יש לך צילום מסך (מומלץ) אתה יכול להשתמש ב Imgur.com כדי להעלות אותו להדביק קישור לכאן.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• בבקשה העתק והדבק את הטקסט המוצג באנגלית במקום בשפה שלך. אם יש לך צילום מסך (מומלץ) אתה יכול להשתמש ב Imgur.com כדי להעלות אותו להדביק קישור לכאן.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• האם טקסט זה זמין במערכת התרגום? אם כן, האם היא תורגמה במשך יותר מ -24 שעות?

• מה הדפדפן שלך?

• אנא הסבר את ההצעה שלך במדויק ותמצית כדי שיהיה קל ככל האפשר להבין למה אתה מתכוון.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• מה הדפדפן שלך?