#124173: "Randomize player order in a rematch"
על מה דוח זה?
מה קרה? אנא בחר מהרשימה מטה
מה קרה? אנא בחר מהרשימה מטה
בבקשה בדוק אם יש כבר דוח על אותו נושא
אם כן, הצביעו בעד הדיווח הזה, דיווחים עם הכי הרבה קולות נחקרים ראשונים
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
תיאור מפורט
-
• אנא העתק/הדבק את הודעת השגיאה המופיעה במסך, אם יש כזו.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• בבקשה הסבר מה רצית לעשות,מה עשית ומה קרה
• מה הדפדפן שלך?
Google Chrome v124
-
• בבקשה העתק והדבק את הטקסט המוצג באנגלית במקום בשפה שלך. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. האם טקסט זה זמין במערכת התרגום? אם כן, האם היא תורגמה במשך יותר מ -24 שעות?
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • מה הדפדפן שלך?
Google Chrome v124
-
• אנא הסבר את ההצעה שלך במדויק ותמצית כדי שיהיה קל ככל האפשר להבין למה אתה מתכוון.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • מה הדפדפן שלך?
Google Chrome v124
-
• מה הוצג על המסך כאשר נחסמה (מסך ריק? חלק ממשק המשחק? הודעת שגיאה?)
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • מה הדפדפן שלך?
Google Chrome v124
-
• איזה חלק של הכללים לא היה מכובד על ידי עיבוד BGA
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• האם אפשר לראות את הפרת החוק בשידור החוזר? אם כן, באיזה מספר מהלך?
• מה הדפדפן שלך?
Google Chrome v124
-
• מה היה המהלך במשחק שרצית לבצע?
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• מה ניסית לעשות שגרם לפעולה הזו
-
• מה קרה כאשר את/ה מנסה לעשות את זה (הודעת שגיאה, הודעת פס סטטוס משחק, ...)?
• מה הדפדפן שלך?
Google Chrome v124
-
• באיזה שלב במשחק הבעייה קרתה (מה היו ההוראות הנכונות)
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• מה קרה כאשר את/ה מנסה לבצע פעולת משחק (הודעת שגיאה, הודעת פס סטטוס משחק, ...)?
• מה הדפדפן שלך?
Google Chrome v124
-
• אנא תאר/י את הנושא המוצג. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • מה הדפדפן שלך?
Google Chrome v124
-
• בבקשה העתק והדבק את הטקסט המוצג באנגלית במקום בשפה שלך. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. האם טקסט זה זמין במערכת התרגום? אם כן, האם היא תורגמה במשך יותר מ -24 שעות?
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • מה הדפדפן שלך?
Google Chrome v124
-
• אנא הסבר את ההצעה שלך במדויק ותמצית כדי שיהיה קל ככל האפשר להבין למה אתה מתכוון.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • מה הדפדפן שלך?
Google Chrome v124
היסטוריית דיווחים
Two player games should swap starting players on a rematch.
Multi-player games should rotate the starting player and randomize the player order. If rotating the starting player is too much to remember between games, randomizing the starting player (avoiding the previous starting player) is acceptable.
Rearranging seats at the table is totally something we do in real life if we're playing multiple short games.
In real life we use chwazi to determine player order for every game we play. In 7 wonders nobody likes to sit next to the player who likes heavy military and we all want to sit next to the pacifist.
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582
And this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41518
הוסף לדוח הזה
- מספר שולחן/מהלך אחר
- האם לחיצה על F5 פתר את הבעיה?
- האם הבעיה הופיע כמה פעמים? בכל פעם? באופן אקראי?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
